Monday, December 31, 2012

HP Test V:C RETEST - Day 1 (TC)


GOAL:
Establish scent viability

TESTING PROTOCOL:
Sample condition: test at room temp; refrigerate to preserve

BASELINE:  3 successive trials of 90%+ conducted on 2 subsequent sets



DOG ID #
3
TEST DATE
12/31/12
TEST
HP Test V:C - scent wheel w/ gauze variables
DONOR ID #
3
ORIGIN
Saliva Sample 1
SCENT TYPE (saliva/spit/sweat/other
saliva
SEIZURE TYPE
status epilectus, tonic-clonic, complex partial
DATE of CREATION
12/18/12
TIME of CAPTURE (before/during/after)
during, after
SAMPLE STATE (cotton/gauze pad/clothing/other
1/2 gauze pad cut on diagonal
STORAGE CONTAINER (covered test tube/double bagged))
double bagged;
frozen
SAMPLE CONDITION (frozen/refrigerated/room temp/other)
created at room temp; refrigerated; tested at room temp
SAMPLE ID
AGE when USED
HP 1
Day 15

MEDICATIONS
rescue Diastat
SAMPLE SUMMARY
tested @ room temp; stored in a baggie refridgerated
SAMPLE SUMMARY & DIFFERENCES
HP created from Saliva Sample 1

INTENSITY (# of holes
13

CONTAINER TYPE
glass salt shaker

PRESENTATION (hand/surface/wheel)
HP Test V: C - wheel- reteach


# of CONTAINERS
6
66



# of SCENT OPTIONS
1
11



REPS
10
1010



% SUCCESS
80%
80%20%


COMMENTS
*1
*2
*3



TARGET in #
6
31



EASE OF FIND
1 Very easy     2 Easy
  3 Normal
4 Difficult     5 Very difficult
4
45



TIME






Baseline Criteria Met:  (TC)


*1 - The first rep I positioned the 'hot' container close to where he would come to the wheel
(he indicated: 6/4/6/4/6/6/6/6/6/6)

*2 - Again, the first rep I positioned the 'hot' container close to where he would come to the wheel
(he indicated: 6/6/3/3/3/3/3/3/3/3)

*3 - This time, I did not position the 'hot' container close to where he would come to the wheel
(he indicated: 5/3/6/3/3 - then I stopped as I didn't want Nad to get frustrated).

NOTE:
It appears that the sample is no longer viable since Nad had accurately indicated previously with the original saliva sample with gauze variables. (Saliva HP Test V:C (BCM) 12/23/12  Day 6 of sample)  Today the sample is 15 days old.  We did not previously test him on saliva seizure sample with non-seizure saliva sample as the non-seizure saliva sample was contaminated.

When we tested the HP saliva sample with another person's non-seizure saliva sample (HP Saliva Test V:D), Nad could not indicate the HP saliva seizure sample, so we were re-testing to see if that TC was due to sample viability or dog skill.

Before determining that HP Saliva Sample 1 is no longer viable, tomorrow we will hydrate the sample by spritzing with distilled water to see if the hydration enhances the scent enough for Nad to identify it.


No comments:

Post a Comment