GOAL:
Establish scent viability
TESTING PROTOCOL:
TESTING PROTOCOL:
Sample condition: test at room temp; refrigerate to preserve
BASELINE: 3 successive trials of 90%+ conducted on 2 subsequent sets
DOG ID #
|
3
|
TEST DATE
|
12/18/12
| |||
TEST
|
Test for Donor Sample I: A, B, C
| |||||
DONOR ID #
|
3
|
ORIGIN
|
mouth
| |||
SCENT TYPE (saliva/spit/sweat/other
|
saliva
|
SEIZURE TYPE
|
status epilectus, tonic-clonic, complex partial
| |||
(DATE of CAPTURE
|
08.19.2012
|
TIME of CAPTURE (before/during/after)
|
during, after
| |||
SAMPLE STATE (cotton/gauze pad/clothing/other
|
gauze
|
STORAGE CONTAINER (covered test tube/double bagged))
|
double bagged;
frozen | |||
SAMPLE CONDITION (frozen/refrigerated/room temp/other)
|
rcvd @ room temp, stored frozen, thawed to room temp
|
SAMPLE ID
AGE when USED
|
Sample 1
Day 1
| |||
MEDICATIONS
|
rescue Diastat
| |||||
SAMPLE SUMMARY
|
tested @ room temp; stored in a baggie frozen
| |||||
SAMPLE SUMMARY & DIFFERENCES
|
119 days since capture
frozen/thawed multiple times
|
1/2 original 3X3 sterile gauze pad, cut on diagonal
| ||||
INTENSITY (# of holes
|
13
|
13
| ||||
CONTAINER TYPE
|
glass salt shaker
|
glass salt shaker
| ||||
PRESENTATION (hand/surface/wheel)
|
*1 Test I:A
*2 Test I:B *3 Test I:C |
Test I:C
Scent Wheel w/Gauze Dummies | ||||
# of CONTAINERS
|
1-Hand
|
1-in Scent Wheel
|
1-in Scent Wheel w/Gauze Dummies
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
# of SCENT OPTIONS
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
REPS
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
% SUCCESS
|
100
|
100
|
80
|
100
|
100
|
90
|
COMMENTS
|
*1
|
*2
|
*3
|
*4
|
*5
|
*6
|
TARGET in #
|
N/A
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
EASE OF FIND
1 Very easy 2 Easy
3 Normal
4 Difficult 5 Very difficult
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
TIME
|
forgot
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
BASELINE CRITERIA MET: 12/18/12
Sample considered viable for hydration; will become HP (Hydrated Parent)
*3:
incorrect indicator on 2nd rep (indicated 6) and 3rd rep (indicated 5). I made the next two reps easier with the target closer to where he approached the wheel. He then proceeded to get the rest correct.
*4,*5:
Nad once in a while indicated and then quickly 'popped' up to run after a treat (did he know he correctly indicated?), he would immediately go back to the correct one and station longer.
*6:
Incorrect indicator on 5th rep (indicated 2). My personal observation was that he appeared to be getting tired. Possibly he worked harder since he hadn't done it in a while. (Last testing done 10/26/12)
No comments:
Post a Comment